{"id":13002,"date":"2018-07-26T03:50:13","date_gmt":"2018-07-26T03:50:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/?p=13002"},"modified":"2018-07-27T03:52:01","modified_gmt":"2018-07-27T03:52:01","slug":"what-is-a-poison-pill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/what-is-a-poison-pill\/","title":{"rendered":"What is a &#8216;poison pill&#8217;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/yannick-thams-444395\">Yannick Thams<\/a>, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/suffolk-university-1711\">Suffolk University<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Papa John\u2019s recently forced founder and former Chairman John Schnatter to resign over allegations he made a racial slur. Now the pizza chain <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/07\/23\/business\/papa-johns-john-schnatter-poison-pill.html\">is battling<\/a> to keep him from clawing his way back into the company. <\/p>\n<p>To do so, Papa John\u2019s says it\u2019s taking advantage of a corporate strategy often used to fend off hostile takeover attempts: the \u201cpoison pill.\u201d Schnatter, who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2018-07-26\/papa-john-s-founder-sues-pizza-company-for-documents-over-ouster\">is suing<\/a> to access internal documents, still owns about 30 percent of the company, making him the largest single shareholder.<\/p>\n<p>What is a poison pill, why would a company use it and does it actually work? <\/p>\n<h2>Raising the cost of a takeover<\/h2>\n<p>The modern publicly traded corporation is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/241754973_Stockholders_and_Stakeholders_The_Battle_for_Control_of_the_Corporation\">often the theater<\/a> of fierce battles for control.  <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s therefore no surprise that hostile takeovers \u2013 in which an outside entity tries to take over a company by convincing shareholders to sell their stakes \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2393275\">have become increasingly popular<\/a> in the U.S. One way companies handle such a threat is by passing protective measures like the poison pill, which was conceived in the 1980s during the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crainsnewyork.com\/article\/20171218\/OPINION\/171219941\/reliving-new-yorks-glory-days-of-junk-bonds-and-hostile-takeovers\">heyday of junk bonds and hostile takeovers<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>In short, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.investopedia.com\/terms\/p\/poisonpill.asp\">poison pill<\/a> is designed to make the company\u2019s purchase by a \u201chostile\u201d suitor dramatically more expensive. <\/p>\n<p>Two types exist. The so-called \u201cflip-in\u201d allows shareholders other than the acquirer to buy additional shares at a highly discounted rate if the board of directors does not approve the takeover. The other is called a \u201cflip-over,\u201d which permits stockholders to buy the shares of the acquirer at a discount if the takeover is successful.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-right \">\n            <img alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/229519\/original\/file-20180726-106521-136w843.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=237&amp;fit=clip\"><figcaption>\n              <span class=\"caption\">Schnatter had literally become the face of Papa John\u2019s.<\/span><br \/>\n              <span class=\"attribution\"><a class=\"source\" href=\"http:\/\/www.apimages.com\/metadata\/Index\/Papa-John-s-Founder\/c3640a12fb884ab395e0b17fca4b4c22\/2\/0\">AP Photo\/Charles Krupa<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n            <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Both strategies dilute shares held by the acquirer, making the takeover attempt more costly and difficult. A poison pill also puts pressure on the suitor to negotiate directly with the board. <\/p>\n<h2>Do they work?<\/h2>\n<p>While many corporations have adopted poison pills during the past decades, their use has been equivocal and vividly debated among practitioners and academic researchers. More recently, companies have been <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206312441209\">increasingly repealing<\/a> poison pills or allowing them to expire.<\/p>\n<p>As a <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/citations?user=MSg9454AAAAJ&amp;hl=en\">scholar of corporate strategy<\/a>, I\u2019ve found that studies of their effectiveness show mixed results.<\/p>\n<p>For example, <a href=\"http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/503648\">some empirical research<\/a> has shown no relationship between the adoption of a poison pill and the probability of whether a company is ultimately acquired. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206316635250\">Some scholars<\/a> have also argued that poison pills can signal that the company has entrenched \u201cineffective\u201d managers and is trying to protect them from market oversight. <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/100644\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/>Other scholars have found value in the use of poison pills, for example by enabling top management to focus on <a href=\"https:\/\/corpgov.law.harvard.edu\/2015\/12\/18\/the-long-term-value-of-the-poison-pill\/\">long-term performance<\/a> \u2013 rather than worrying about hostile takeovers \u2013 and <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/503648\">resulting<\/a> in more profit for investors after a sale. And researchers have found evidence that poison pills do in fact <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206312441209\">lower the likelihood<\/a> of acquisition.<\/p>\n<p><span><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/yannick-thams-444395\">Yannick Thams<\/a>, Assistant Professor of Strategy and International Business, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/suffolk-university-1711\">Suffolk University<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>This article was originally published on <a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\">The Conversation<\/a>. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/what-is-a-poison-pill-100644\">original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yannick Thams, Suffolk University Papa John\u2019s recently forced founder and former Chairman John Schnatter to resign over allegations he made a racial slur. Now the pizza chain is battling to keep him from clawing his way back into the company. To do so, Papa John\u2019s says it\u2019s taking advantage of a corporate strategy often used [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":12999,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[4854,4856,629,4855,2197,4424],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13002"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13002"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13003,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13002\/revisions\/13003"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}