{"id":19164,"date":"2020-01-03T00:40:46","date_gmt":"2020-01-03T00:40:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/?p=19164"},"modified":"2020-01-04T03:44:44","modified_gmt":"2020-01-04T03:44:44","slug":"lawyers-are-trying-to-scare-you-with-facebook-ads","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/lawyers-are-trying-to-scare-you-with-facebook-ads\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawyers are trying to scare you with Facebook ads"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/elizabeth-c-tippett-305207\">Elizabeth C. Tippett<\/a>, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/university-of-oregon-811\">University of Oregon<\/a><\/em> and <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/jesse-king-925674\">Jesse King<\/a>, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/weber-state-university-2070\">Weber State University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Some ads can be more than misleading \u2013 they can put your health at risk.<\/p>\n<p>Last year, ads paid for by law firms and legal referral companies <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/technology\/2019\/12\/30\/facebook-disables-some-misleading-ads-hiv-prevention-drugs-responding-growing-outcry\">started cropping up on Facebook<\/a>. Typically, they linked Truvada and other HIV-prevention drugs with severe bone and kidney damage.<\/p>\n<p>But like a lawsuit, these assertions do not always reflect the consensus of the medical community. They also do not take into account the benefit of the drug or how often the side effects occur.<\/p>\n<p>On Dec. 30, Facebook <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/feature\/nbc-out\/following-backlash-facebook-disables-misleading-hiv-medication-ads-n1108741\">said<\/a> it disabled some of the ads after more than 50 LGBTQ and HIV\/AIDS groups signed an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glaad.org\/blog\/open-letter-facebook\">open letter<\/a> to Facebook condemning them for \u201cscaring away at-risk HIV negative people from the leading drug that blocks HIV infections.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Based on <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3220066\">our research involving<\/a> televised drug injury ads, advocacy groups are right to raise the alarm about how these ads might affect important health decisions.<\/p>\n<p>Although drug injury ads are selling legal services, that\u2019s rarely obvious, making it harder for consumers to invoke their <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0090429517310580\">usual skepticism<\/a> toward medical information from lawyers.<\/p>\n<p>Here are a few deceptive tactics we noticed in the Facebook Truvada ads, which you can also spot in drug injury advertisements more broadly.<\/p>\n<h2>Ads in disguise<\/h2>\n<p>Advertisements in this genre sometimes <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2445771\">masquerade<\/a> as other types of content, like public service announcements or local news. For example, a series of identical Truvada-related ads sponsored by \u201cLawsuit Watch\u201d and \u201cAdvocate Alliance Group\u201d prominently featured video from a local news story.<\/p>\n<p>This clever but ultimately misleading tactic is known within the marketing literature as an <a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.com\/books?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;id=Gk94AgAAQBAJ&amp;oi=fnd&amp;pg=PA117\">\u201cOmega strategy,\u201d<\/a> in which the advertiser tries to \u201credefine the sales interaction\u201d to disguise its pitch. It\u2019s like when insurance companies offer to \u201cassess your personal risk,\u201d when they\u2019re really just trying to sell you insurance.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-center \"><img src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308330\/original\/file-20191231-11914-pnup9d.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" sizes=\"(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308330\/original\/file-20191231-11914-pnup9d.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=473&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308330\/original\/file-20191231-11914-pnup9d.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=473&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308330\/original\/file-20191231-11914-pnup9d.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=473&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308330\/original\/file-20191231-11914-pnup9d.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=595&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308330\/original\/file-20191231-11914-pnup9d.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=595&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308330\/original\/file-20191231-11914-pnup9d.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=595&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption><span class=\"caption\">An example of Facebook ads about HIV-prevention drug Truvada.<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"attribution\"><span class=\"source\">Screenshot by author of Facebook ad bank<\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Similarly, these legal advertisers appear to be educating patients but their true goal is to sign you up for a lawsuit \u2013 and most likely <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/inside-the-mass-tort-machine-that-powers-thousands-of-roundup-lawsuits-11574700480\">sell your name<\/a> to a lawyer looking for clients.<\/p>\n<p>What makes the ad even more complex to process is that embeds actual local news footage, which mostly consists of reporting allegations from a lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p>By using news broadcasters to deliver their claims, the advertiser enhances the message\u2019s credibility, which makes it less likely that consumers will critically analyze the content.<\/p>\n<h2>Who sponsored this?<\/h2>\n<p>Drug injury ads can also mislead when the sponsors are not clearly identifiable as for-profit legal referral businesses.<\/p>\n<p>For example, some Truvada-related ads that Facebook removed were sponsored by \u201cA Case for Women,\u201d whose name suggests an advocacy organization. The Facebook page for this entity does little to clear up this misapprehension. It\u2019s only when you track down its website that you get a whiff of legalese, with references to a \u201cfree consult\u201d and the advice to \u201ctake action (legal or otherwise)\u201d for \u201clife-changing financial compensation.\u201d Even then, the information is presented in the name of \u201cWomen Empowerment,\u201d along with inspirational pictures and blog posts.<\/p>\n<p>The same kind of confusion can arise from ad sponsors with names like \u201cLawsuit Watch\u201d and \u201cAdvocate Alliance Group.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-right zoomable\"><a href=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip\"><img src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=237&amp;fit=clip\" sizes=\"(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=590&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=590&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=590&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=742&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=742&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308331\/original\/file-20191231-11914-2p4ovf.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=742&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><figcaption><span class=\"caption\">It\u2019s not obvious that this ad sponsor is a legal referral agency soliciting consumers to sue drug manufacturers.<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"attribution\"><span class=\"source\">Facebook ad bank<\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Consumers are misled when advertisers do not clearly disclose their status as law firms or for-profit legal referral businesses. In <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3220066\">one experiment<\/a> for a study published last year, we showed consumers different versions of drug injury TV ads. Around 25% of consumers did not recognize drug injury advertising as such when the sponsor was not clearly revealed, compared with 15% when an attorney was prominently featured. By contrast, only 2% of consumers misidentified the source of a pharmaceutical ad.<\/p>\n<p>This confusion appears to alter how consumers process information found in the ads. Those who were shown the more deceptive drug injury ad perceived the featured drug to be riskier, expressed a greater reluctance to take the drug and were more likely to question their doctor about the medication.<\/p>\n<p>When you\u2019re dealing with medication that prevents a life-threatening virus like HIV, transparency is essential.<\/p>\n<h2>Attention-getting claims<\/h2>\n<p>Drug injury advertisements also <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2445771\">commonly include<\/a> stark language and imagery like \u201cconsumer alert,\u201d \u201cmedical alert\u201d or \u201cwarning.\u201d This language is used to capture a viewer\u2019s attention. We have found that drug injury advertisements with more graphic descriptions of side effects inflate perceptions of risk.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-center \"><img src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308332\/original\/file-20191231-11929-1urkl38.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\" sizes=\"(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308332\/original\/file-20191231-11929-1urkl38.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=475&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308332\/original\/file-20191231-11929-1urkl38.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=475&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308332\/original\/file-20191231-11929-1urkl38.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=475&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308332\/original\/file-20191231-11929-1urkl38.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=597&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308332\/original\/file-20191231-11929-1urkl38.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=597&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308332\/original\/file-20191231-11929-1urkl38.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=597&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption><span class=\"caption\">These ads characterize Truvada as dangerous.<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"attribution\"><span class=\"source\">Facebook ad bank<\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Language of this sort can be found in the Facebook ads about Truvada. Some ads are framed as a \u201cTruvada NRTIs Drug Alert,\u201d claiming that \u201cthe manufacturers had a safer drug &amp; kept it secret all while they kept selling the dangerous one.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But as the authors of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.glaad.org\/blog\/open-letter-facebook\">open letter<\/a> to Facebook point out, characterizing this particular drug as unsafe is not accurate, particularly when compared with the obvious harm of HIV infection.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, framing ads in this way is not necessary. Advertisers could instead state they are looking for individuals who have experienced the listed side effects without portraying the ad as an \u201calert\u201d that the drug is \u201cdangerous.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-right \"><img src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308333\/original\/file-20191231-11896-2kji1h.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=237&amp;fit=clip\" sizes=\"(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308333\/original\/file-20191231-11896-2kji1h.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=1141&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 600w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308333\/original\/file-20191231-11896-2kji1h.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=1141&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1200w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308333\/original\/file-20191231-11896-2kji1h.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=600&amp;h=1141&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 1800w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308333\/original\/file-20191231-11896-2kji1h.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1434&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=1 754w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308333\/original\/file-20191231-11896-2kji1h.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=30&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1434&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=2 1508w, https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/308333\/original\/file-20191231-11896-2kji1h.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=15&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;h=1434&amp;fit=crop&amp;dpr=3 2262w\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption><span class=\"caption\">The AIDS Foundation of Chicago sponsored advertising to counteract legal solicitation ads.<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"attribution\"><span class=\"source\">Facebook ad bank<\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Better regulation<\/h2>\n<p>These types of ads have been almost entirely unregulated until recently.<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Trade Commission, which regulates advertising, declined to act for many years. But in September, the agency <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/news-events\/press-releases\/2019\/09\/ftc-flags-potentially-unlawful-tv-ads-prescription-drug-lawsuits\">issued a letter<\/a> to seven law firms and legal referral companies warning them that their advertising is deceptive, suggesting it may be finally changing its tune.<\/p>\n<p>And although states regulate legal advertising through attorney ethics rules, our past research found <a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2445771\">no examples<\/a> in which a lawyer was disciplined for misleading drug injury ads.<\/p>\n<p>The last line of defense, then, is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/policies\/ads\/#\">Facebook itself<\/a>, through its ad policies. Beyond blocking misleading ads, our research suggests that clear disclaimers can help to reduce \u2013 but not eliminate \u2013 consumer confusion.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, it\u2019s up to federal and state regulators to treat drug injury advertisements as a matter of public health and require advertisers to present medical information in a way that helps, rather than misleads, consumers.<\/p>\n<p>[ <em>Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend.<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/us\/newsletters\/weekly-highlights-61?utm_source=TCUS&amp;utm_medium=inline-link&amp;utm_campaign=newsletter-text&amp;utm_content=weeklybest\">Sign up for our weekly newsletter<\/a>. ]<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/129264\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: http:\/\/theconversation.com\/republishing-guidelines --><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/elizabeth-c-tippett-305207\">Elizabeth C. Tippett<\/a>, Associate Professor, School of Law, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/university-of-oregon-811\">University of Oregon<\/a><\/em> and <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/jesse-king-925674\">Jesse King<\/a>, Assistant Professor of Marketing Weber State University, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/weber-state-university-2070\">Weber State University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>This article is republished from <a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\">The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/lawyers-are-trying-to-scare-you-with-facebook-ads-129264\">original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Elizabeth C. Tippett, University of Oregon and Jesse King, Weber State University Some ads can be more than misleading \u2013 they can put your health at risk. Last year, ads paid for by law firms and legal referral companies started cropping up on Facebook. Typically, they linked Truvada and other HIV-prevention drugs with severe bone [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":19165,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,277],"tags":[1711,483,7480,3640,7478,2390,3194,7479],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19164"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19164"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19164\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19168,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19164\/revisions\/19168"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19165"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}