{"id":36429,"date":"2024-04-27T04:12:00","date_gmt":"2024-04-27T04:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/?p=36429"},"modified":"2024-05-05T22:47:07","modified_gmt":"2024-05-05T22:47:07","slug":"the-myth-of-mens-full-time-employment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/the-myth-of-mens-full-time-employment\/","title":{"rendered":"The myth of men\u2019s full-time employment"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/sarah-damaske-1497166\">Sarah Damaske<\/a>, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/penn-state-1258\">Penn State<\/a><\/em> and <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/adrianne-frech-1502418\">Adrianne Frech<\/a>, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/ohio-university-1794\">Ohio University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Men\u2019s employment in the U.S. reached a 20-year high in 2023, with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.frbsf.org\/economic-research\/publications\/economic-letter\/2023\/october\/mens-falling-labor-force-participation-across-generations\/\">nearly 90%<\/a> of men ages 25 to 54 in the workforce, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bls.gov\/opub\/ted\/2023\/labor-force-participation-rate-for-people-ages-25-to-54-in-may-2023-highest-since-january-2007.htm#:%7E:text=Among%20men%20ages%2025%20to,pandemic%20level%20in%20April%202023.\">the Bureau of Labor Statistics<\/a>. This supports the <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0891243216649946\">broad expectation<\/a> \u2013 some might say stereotype \u2013 that full-time employment is the norm for American men.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet examining employment at a single point in time leaves out important information about whether people are able to maintain stable work. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/23780231231197031\">Our recent study<\/a> of male baby boomers\u2019 working lives \u2013 spanning more than two decades \u2013 tells a very different story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In fact, men\u2019s labor force participation has been <a href=\"https:\/\/fred.stlouisfed.org\/series\/LNS11300001\">steadily declining<\/a> since the 1970s, and workers are experiencing greater labor market precarity \u2013 that is, shorter job spells, greater job insecurity and more long-term unemployment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In our research <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/citations?user=VoDOQ44AAAAJ&amp;hl=en&amp;oi=ao\">as experts<\/a> in the study of <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/citations?user=zTqwiBYAAAAJ&amp;hl=en\">people\u2019s employment<\/a> over time, we have <a href=\"http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13524-016-0464-z\">previously challenged the myth<\/a> that most women \u201copt out\u201d of the workforce, establishing that the majority of women work steadily and full time. That led us to suspect that the picture of men\u2019s employment could also be incomplete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To understand these long-term trends, we studied data from about 4,500 men collected over more than 25 years. We were looking for patterns in the amount of time these men spent employed, unemployed and looking for work, and out of the workforce and not looking for work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We were surprised to find that <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/23780231231197031\">only 41%<\/a> of late baby boomer men \u2013 those who were between 14 and 21 years old in 1979 \u2013 worked steadily and continuously, which we defined as working almost every week of the year between ages 27 and 49. This is a cohort of men who were widely thought to have taken a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/books\/edition\/The_Career_Mystique\/dIDgkBiqMO8C?hl=en&amp;gbpv=1&amp;dq=phyllis+moen+roehling&amp;pg=PP13&amp;printsec=frontcover\">lockstep<\/a>\u201d approach to work: entering the labor market when they finished their schooling and remaining employed until retirement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We found most men didn\u2019t fit this stereotype. About a quarter didn\u2019t reach steady employment until they were nearly 50. Another quarter either found themselves increasingly unemployed and out of work as they aged or able to find only intermittent work. Finally, a smaller group of men left the labor market entirely \u2013 some leaving paid work at relatively young ages, while others leaving as they reached middle age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-datawrapper wp-block-embed-datawrapper\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" title=\"Not marching in lockstep\" src=\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/fh9kX\/5\/#?secret=Mgn6rBf28m\" data-secret=\"Mgn6rBf28m\" scrolling=\"no\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"615\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2>Problems with precarity<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>We don\u2019t know exactly why these men followed such a wide range of work patterns during what economists call their \u201cprime earning years.\u201d But we think increasing labor market precarity \u2013 which researchers say is driven in large part by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/books\/edition\/The_State_of_Working_America\/WdM77z0HUcAC?hl=en&amp;gbpv=0\">increases in layoffs<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/qje\/qjab012\">decreases in unionization<\/a> \u2013 played a big role.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For example, we found that men who worked as \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/usa.ipums.org\/usa\/volii\/occ1980.shtml#operator\">operators, fabricators and laborers<\/a>\u201d or in \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/usa.ipums.org\/usa\/volii\/occ1980.shtml#precision\">precision production, craft and repairs<\/a>\u201d were at greater risk of unemployment. These are jobs that provided our own grandfathers with good, well-paying work, but they are also jobs that have become <a href=\"https:\/\/arnekalleberg.web.unc.edu\/books\/good-jobs-bad-jobs\/\">increasingly rare<\/a> since the 1970s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We also found that men were at greater risk if they lived in counties with a higher unemployment rate or in states with more unionized jobs when they first entered the labor market. That latter point likely put them at greater risk of job loss <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2378023116656847\">when those jobs went overseas<\/a> in the 1980s and 1990s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Men who experienced unemployment, more job turnover before the age of 25 or transportation barriers to finding a good job also followed less steady work patterns, suggesting that they may have been forced to take \u201cbad jobs\u201d that provided fewer opportunities to move up the ladder or to earn a living wage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our findings paint a troubling portrait of employment in America. If this kind of unsteady employment characterizes the work patterns of the baby-boom generation, what awaits those of us who follow them? Is there anything we can do about it?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2>Ideas for improvement<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The good news is there are solutions for workers, employers and the federal government. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/23780231231197031\">research<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/07308884231162949\">shows<\/a> that a college degree could protect men from the risk of unemployment or time out of work. The government can support this goal by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amacad.org\/sites\/default\/files\/academy\/multimedia\/pdfs\/publications\/researchpapersmonographs\/CFUE_Economic-Impact\/CFUE_Economic-Impact.pdf\">making college more affordable for workers<\/a>, as the current administration has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefing-room\/presidential-actions\/2021\/10\/29\/a-proclamation-on-national-college-application-month-2021\/\">proposed doing<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For employers, our findings suggest that making work less precarious \u2013 in other words, making it more stable, with better pay and more schedule control \u2013 would be a win-win proposition. Research suggests that employers consistently <a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2019\/06\/the-financial-case-for-good-retail-jobs\">underestimate the costs<\/a> of losing employees. Given how hard it\u2019s been for employers to stay fully staffed \u2013 especially in retail and service work \u2013 making jobs more appealing to workers could pay off in terms of retention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Walmart, for instance, has <a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2017\/12\/the-right-thing-to-do\">increased pay and schedule control<\/a> for its workers. Such moves have been shown to benefit both the employers, through the <a href=\"https:\/\/equitablegrowth.org\/improving-u-s-labor-standards-and-the-quality-of-jobs-to-reduce-the-costs-of-employee-turnover-to-u-s-companies\/\">reduction in employee turnover costs<\/a>, and the employees, through improved work conditions and work benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government could also implement policy changes, such as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/118th-congress\/house-bill\/20\">Protecting the Right to Organize Act<\/a>, to promote workers\u2019 right to unionization, since unionization is consistently linked to <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eeh.2017.08.003\">higher wages<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0003122411414817\">lower levels of inequality<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We don\u2019t think the U.S. needs the jobs that our grandfathers held to return; instead, it needs to turn today\u2019s available jobs into good jobs. The recent National Labor Relations Board \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlrb.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/attachments\/pages\/node-9558\/joint-employer-fact-sheet-2023.pdf\">joint employer<\/a>\u201d ruling, for example, should do this by making it easier for workers at national chains to unionize across franchises, which could improve the working conditions of millions of people in the service industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally, government can take action to make unemployment a less miserable experience. Our findings, both here and elsewhere, suggest that unemployment does considerable harm to <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/07308884231162949\">workers\u2019 careers<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08982643221091775\">and health<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epi.org\/publication\/section-5-benefit-levels-increase-ui-benefits-to-levels-working-families-can-survive-on\/\">Reforming the current unemployment insurance<\/a> system by expanding eligibility and creating progressive wage replacement rates may make it easier for workers to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w27574\">find jobs that better fit their skill set<\/a>, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/books\/edition\/The_Tolls_of_Uncertainty\/DkgHEAAAQBAJ?hl=en\">our research<\/a> suggests could help them return to stable employment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our findings are the canary in a coal mine. They suggest that for future generations, steady employment may be a thing of the past. But the good news is that we can heed the warning and take steps to give everyone access to better jobs and more stable employment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/sarah-damaske-1497166\">Sarah Damaske<\/a>, Professor of Sociology and Labor and Employment Relations, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/penn-state-1258\">Penn State<\/a><\/em> and <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/adrianne-frech-1502418\">Adrianne Frech<\/a>, Associate Professor of Population Health, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/ohio-university-1794\">Ohio University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This article is republished from <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\">The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/the-myth-of-mens-full-time-employment-221078\">original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sarah Damaske, Penn State and Adrianne Frech, Ohio University Men\u2019s employment in the U.S. reached a 20-year high in 2023, with nearly 90% of men ages 25 to 54 in the workforce, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This supports the broad expectation \u2013 some might say stereotype \u2013 that full-time employment is the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":36430,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[277],"tags":[172,224,365,356,15170,15169,3828],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36429"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36429"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36431,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36429\/revisions\/36431"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}