{"id":39838,"date":"2025-07-04T11:15:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-04T11:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/?p=39838"},"modified":"2025-07-04T21:34:52","modified_gmt":"2025-07-04T21:34:52","slug":"conservatives-notch-2-victories-in-their-fight-to-deny-planned-parenthood-federal-funding-through-medicaid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/conservatives-notch-2-victories-in-their-fight-to-deny-planned-parenthood-federal-funding-through-medicaid\/","title":{"rendered":"Conservatives notch 2 victories in their fight to deny Planned Parenthood federal funding through Medicaid"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Rachel Rebouch\u00e9<\/a>, Temple University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conservatives have won two important battles in their decades-long campaign against Planned Parenthood<\/a>, a network of affiliated clinics that are the largest provider of reproductive health services in the U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of these victories was a U.S. Supreme Court ruling<\/a> handed down on June 26, 2025. The other is a provision in the multitrilion-dollar tax-and-spending<\/a> package President Donald Trump has made his top legislative priority. Both follow the same strategy: depriving Planned Parenthood \u2013 and all other providers of abortion care \u2013 from getting reimbursed by Medicaid, the government health insurance program that mainly covers low-income adults and children, as well as people with disabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because Medicaid covers nearly 80 million Americans<\/a>, this bill, and the Supreme Court\u2019s decision, will sever federal support for health care that has nothing to do with abortion, such as annual exams, birth control and prenatal care. Abortions account for 3% of all of Planned Parenthood\u2019s services<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a scholar of reproductive rights<\/a>, I have studied how abortion politics shape the broader provision of reproductive health care.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I see in both the legislation and the court\u2019s ruling a culmination of a strategy to defund Planned Parenthood<\/a> that was in full swing by 2007, toward the end of the George W. Bush administration. This campaign hinges on a strategy of insisting that federal and state dollars are supporting abortion care when they do not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A
A clinic escort assists a patient at a Planned Parenthood health center in Philadelphia in 2022. Angela Weiss\/AFP via Getty Images<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Congress and the Supreme Court<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s package of tax breaks, spending increases and safety net changes passed in the House and the Senate<\/a> by razor-thin margins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the bill\u2019s provisions will make it impossible for patients with Medicaid coverage to get any health care services at clinics like Planned Parenthood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The provision will last only for a year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The House approved the same version of the package that the Senate had passed a week after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states cannot be sued by patients if they make it impossible for Planned Parenthood clinics to be reimbursed by Medicaid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The case, Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic<\/a>, arose when a South Carolina woman wanted to get gynecological care at her local Planned Parenthood clinic. The rationale South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster gave for the state\u2019s policy was that Planned Parenthood is an abortion provider.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Man
South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster stands outside the Supreme Court building in Washington in April 2025 and speaks about his state\u2019s legal dispute regarding Medicaid funding for health care at Planned Parenthood clinics. Kayla Bartkowski\/Getty Images<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Medicaid and abortion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

To be clear, neither the legal dispute nor the provision in the legislative package had anything to do with the use of federal or state dollars to fund abortion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although Planned Parenthood offers abortion where and when it is legal<\/a>, this provision and the court\u2019s decision concern Medicaid reimbursement for all other services. Abortion care is not covered by Medicaid under federal law except in cases of rape, incest or a threat to the pregnant patient\u2019s life<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Medicaid patients instead have relied on their plan at Planned Parenthood clinics when they get annual exams, prenatal care, mental health support, birth control, treatment for sexually transmitted infections, cervical cancer screenings and fertility referrals<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

None of those services will be covered by Medicaid for a year. Patients will have to find another health care provider \u2013 as long as one is available.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While that provision is in effect, Medicaid won\u2019t be allowed to reimburse Planned Parenthood for any services, mirroring what states just won the right to do in the Supreme Court ruling \u2013 but at the national level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although the bill blocks Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood for only 12 months, the ruling lets states exclude any provider from its Medicaid program because they also provide abortions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, people who rely on Medicaid funding will lose access to all of those essential services not just at Planned Parenthood but potentially at any other providers that also offer abortion care.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given the number of states that ban almost all abortion<\/a>, I have no doubt that more states will do that, especially if this Medicaid funding provision expires after a year without being renewed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A
Abortion-rights demonstrators holds a sign in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington as the Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic case is heard on April 2, 2025. Tom Williams\/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Roots of this defunding strategy<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Politicians began to call for defunding Planned Parenthood about 20 years ago, following efforts by anti-abortion activists to discredit the organization<\/a> altogether.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

U.S. Rep. Mike Pence introduced the first federal legislation<\/a> aimed at \u201cdefunding\u201d Planned Parenthood in 2007. It failed to muster enough support in Congress to become law. States such as Texas<\/a> then started down that path.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first national legislative success came in 2015. Both houses of Congress passed a budget reconciliation measure with a provision to defund Planned Parenthood that year, but President Barack Obama vetoed it. Republicans had threatened to shut down the government over those demands. A year later, the GOP included a call to defund Planned Parenthood in its presidential campaign platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before Obama left office, his administration passed a rule<\/a> in December 2016 protecting federal funds for family planning for health care facilities that also provided abortion. The Trump administration rolled back<\/a> that rule in 2017.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Trump administration relied on an argument that any support for a health care provider that offers patients abortion services, no matter how segregated the sources of funding, is tantamount to subsidizing abortion<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What to expect next<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Nationally, 16 million women of reproductive age rely on Medicaid<\/a>, and 1 in 5 women will visit a Planned Parenthood clinic for health care at least once in their lives. Those clinics depend on Medicaid reimbursement to offer an array of reproductive health care services, such as prenatal care, that are not tied to abortion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If Planned Parenthood clinics can\u2019t bill Medicaid for those services, many will close. Planned Parenthood estimates<\/a> that it could see almost 200 closures \u2013 90% of them in states where abortion is legal. That means over 1 million low-income people risk losing access to their health care provider.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And once clinics close, they may never reopen, U.S. Sen. Patty Murray<\/a>, a Washington Democrat, recently predicted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Should the number of Planned Parenthood clinics plummet, it will threaten access to contraceptives, which are all the more important in preventing unwanted pregnancies for people living in states that have banned abortion. Researchers have repeatedly found that unwanted pregnancies, when people are denied access to abortion services<\/a>, are correlated with increased debt, missed educational and employment opportunities, mental health problems, and diminished care for a family\u2019s older children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition, pregnant patients and new parents may have more limited options for prenatal and postnatal care. That could cause the country\u2019s already-high rates<\/a> of maternal and infant mortality to increase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rachel Rebouch\u00e9<\/a>, Professor of Law, Temple University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article is republished from The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rachel Rebouch\u00e9, Temple University Conservatives have won two important battles in their decades-long campaign against Planned Parenthood, a network of affiliated clinics that are the largest provider of reproductive health services in the U.S. One of these victories was a U.S. Supreme Court ruling handed down on June 26, 2025. The other is a provision […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":39839,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8025,46,42,295,10,36,4,38],"tags":[2388,9265,885,891,886,860,1097,8632,3050,4695,2391,2240,2485,1797],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39838"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39838"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39838\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39840,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39838\/revisions\/39840"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39839"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}