{"id":42873,"date":"2026-07-15T07:15:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-15T14:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/?p=42873"},"modified":"2026-07-30T01:03:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T08:03:13","slug":"for-nearly-250-years-the-us-has-had-eyes-on-latin-america-but-interventions-then-looked-rather-different","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/for-nearly-250-years-the-us-has-had-eyes-on-latin-america-but-interventions-then-looked-rather-different\/","title":{"rendered":"For nearly 250 years, the US has had eyes on Latin America \u2013 but interventions then looked rather different"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Lindsay Schakenbach Regele<\/a>, Miami University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since the beginning of the second Trump administration, the United States has ramped up military, economic and political interventions<\/a> in Latin America.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nowhere were those three factors more clear than the U.S. abduction of Venezuelan President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro in January 2026. Since then, the Trump administration has used a mix of carrots and sticks to cajole<\/a> what remains of Maduro\u2019s government to support U.S. aims, including opening up the country\u2019s oil industry to foreign development<\/a> and targeted killings of accused criminals in the country<\/a>. At the same time, the U.S. has found local Venezuelan allies in opposition leaders such as Mar\u00eda Corina Machado, winner of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize and a longtime Maduro critic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a historian<\/a> of early U.S. political economy, diplomacy and war, I believe the ongoing U.S. intervention in Venezuela echoes a far earlier intervention in the early 19th century.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was then, in 1805, that the South American revolutionary Francisco de Miranda visited the U.S. on a charm offensive to meet with leading statesmen, including President Thomas Jefferson. In a similar vein as Machado today, his goal in meeting with U.S. officials was to rally support<\/a> for his proposed expedition to overthrow an unpopular government at home.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fight against the Spanish Empire<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

From almost the beginning, America\u2019s founders wanted to protect and expand the country beyond the 13 original states. In addition to running up against vast tracts of land populated by Native Americans, that meant almost immediate rivalries with the foreign empires \u2013 Britain, France and Spain \u2013 that had laid claim to large parts of the modern-day U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was in this age of revolution and expansion in Europe and the Americas that Miranda cut a ubiquitous figure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He was a veteran of the American Revolution, fighting in a U.S.-allied Spanish army against the British in Florida<\/a>. He would go on to fight among republican forces during the French Revolution, being imprisoned by the more radical Jacobins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet it was the independence of South America from the Spanish Empire \u2013 particularly in his native Venezuela \u2013 that could be considered his life\u2019s work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Miranda had spent over two decades courting allies in the U.S.<\/a> in support of South American republicanism \u2013 and specifically the overthrow of the Spanish colonial government in Caracas and elsewhere. Such was Miranda\u2019s successful cultivation of powerful Americans that Alexander Hamilton, the nation\u2019s first Treasury secretary, was one of his most influential advocates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1784, Hamilton sent Miranda a long list of notables<\/a> who would be interested in South American intervention. Then, in 1798, once Hamilton was appointed inspector general<\/a>, he implied that the recently expanded U.S. Army could be a vehicle for seizing Spanish territory<\/a>. Although that didn\u2019t come to fruition at the time, the point was clear: Miranda believed American statesmen were receptive to his ideas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"An
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton appear alongside George Washington in an old painting. MPI\/Getty Images<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In the early 19th century, anticolonial agitation rocked the Spanish territory that would soon become Venezuela. Increasing Spanish costs for defense, such as building forts and training militia, led to higher taxes and strained local economies. That came after several tax rebellions broke out in the last decades of the 18th century<\/a>. In general, there was widespread societal discontent over restrictive Spanish trade monopolies<\/a>, as well as exclusive government posts for Spanish-born judges and officials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The birth of a revolutionary plot<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Soon after their own revolution from colonial rule, many Americans had a general sympathy for South American colonial subjects<\/a> \u2013 if a limited understanding of their political situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, U.S. investors wanted access to the South American silver trade<\/a>, as well as an end to Spanish royal monopolies on Venezuela\u2019s coffee, cacao and indigo<\/a>, just like U.S. investors today eye oil<\/a> and real estate<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Amid this context, Miranda arrived in New York City<\/a> in the fall of 1805 with plans to find allies for a scheme to foment a war for independence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He met with William Smith, an old friend and the son-in-law of former President John Adams. Smith, serving as surveyor of the port of New York, connected him with a wealthy merchant named Samuel Ogden, who often sailed armed vessels to Haiti. The two men suggested that Miranda travel to Washington to secure official U.S. government support before proceeding with his plans to overturn the government in what became Venezuela.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Miranda arrived at the White House, he sat in on a Cabinet meeting and was invited to dine with Jefferson. They chatted about revolution<\/a>, and Jefferson spoke favorably of Spanish American independence, predicting that it would soon come to pass.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jefferson would later write to Don Valent\u00edn de Foronda<\/a>, Spanish minister to the U.S., that his administration \u201chad no suspicion that (Miranda) expected to engage men here.\u201d But it would be very surprising if Jefferson had not caught whiff of the expedition \u2013 either from Miranda himself or through gossip.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Indeed, the capital\u2019s elites were abuzz with Miranda\u2019s visit and plans<\/a>. Washington merchant and investor William Mayne Duncanson<\/a>, for example, called on Jefferson to offer his services in the venture, assuming that Jefferson was amenable to Miranda\u2019s plans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whatever Jefferson\u2019s knowledge, he also cared about America\u2019s diplomatic reputation \u2013 and, more broadly, the law of nations. So he worked for several years to convince Spain<\/a> that the U.S. government was not involved in organizing the expedition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Failure abroad and domestic blowback<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Miranda returned to New York from Washington in early January 1806 without official support. He assumed, however, that he had the tacit approval of the Jefferson administration. So he, Smith and Ogden fitted out a merchant vessel called the Leander with military stores and 200 men, who had varying degrees of understanding<\/a> about what they had signed on to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They left New York City on Feb. 2, 1806, and the press began speculating about where the ship was going and who was on board.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"An
An artist\u2019s rendering of Miranda in his prison cell in Sevilla, Spain. Universal History Archive\/Universal Images Group via Getty Images<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

On Feb. 22, a list of incriminating questions addressed to Secretary of State James Madison appeared in the Philadelphia Gazette. This editorial, assumed by other newspaper editors to be submitted by the Spanish ambassador, accused Madison and Jefferson of condoning Miranda\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Partly to avoid culpability at home and abroad<\/a>, Jefferson pressed charges against Ogden and Smith. They were arrested on Feb. 20 and tried in a federal court that summer. A sympathetic jury declared them not guilty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, members of Miranda\u2019s expedition were captured by Spanish soldiers off the coast of what would soon become Venezuela and tried for their attempted insurrection. The majority were imprisoned; 10 men were hanged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Miranda escaped to Aruba and later played a major role in the Venezuelan war of independence from Spain<\/a> that begin in 1810. There, he briefly led the country before being sidelined by his proteg\u00e9, the great liberator Sim\u00f3n Bol\u00edvar<\/a>, who believed Miranda traitorously reached armistice terms with the Spanish Empire in 1812 and gave him up to Spanish authorities. Miranda died in a prison in Spain in 1816.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the U.S., the fate of the American prisoners fueled public outrage<\/a> and an acrimonious political debate about expedition. As Jefferson\u2019s opponents criticized him for sanctioning intervention and neglecting to free the prisoners, his supporters lashed out at the opposing Federalist Party for allegedly orchestrating a rebellion in Spain\u2019s colonies<\/a> in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Miranda\u2019s expedition was one of the earliest instances of debates of the U.S. considering intervention in Latin America. At this point in its young history, the U.S. government officially refused to countenance a military expedition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But it would launch a long history of foreign elites like Miranda believing that American intervention could be a necessary tool for creating a new political reality at home. The goal, as ever, was freedom from unpopular rule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lindsay Schakenbach Regele<\/a>, Associate Professor of History, Miami University<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article is republished from The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Lindsay Schakenbach Regele, Miami University Since the beginning of the second Trump administration, the United States has ramped up military, economic and political interventions in Latin America. Nowhere were those three factors more clear than the U.S. abduction of Venezuelan President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro in January 2026. Since then, the Trump administration has used a mix […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":42874,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8025,46,295,10,296,36,4,38],"tags":[2104,4032,17008,4683,671,885,891,886,860,17939,17937,4162,520,17940,3617,17938,17340,17339,2811],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42873"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42873"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42875,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42873\/revisions\/42875"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42874"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}