{"id":9305,"date":"2017-06-05T22:51:37","date_gmt":"2017-06-05T22:51:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/?p=9305"},"modified":"2017-06-05T22:51:37","modified_gmt":"2017-06-05T22:51:37","slug":"why-trumps-withdrawal-from-paris-doesnt-matter-as-much-as-you-think","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/why-trumps-withdrawal-from-paris-doesnt-matter-as-much-as-you-think\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Trump&#8217;s withdrawal from Paris doesn&#8217;t matter as much as you think"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/robert-h-scott-iii-380235\">Robert H. Scott III<\/a>, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/monmouth-university-1242\">Monmouth University<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/why-trumps-decision-to-leave-paris-accord-hurts-the-us-and-the-world-78707#comment_1304030\">Many reacted<\/a> to President Donald Trump\u2019s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord with understandable dismay, fearful that the U.S. <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/trumps-decision-to-withdraw-from-the-paris-accord-cedes-global-leadership-to-china-76279\">is shirking its global leadership role<\/a>, will fall behind in green technology and is helping usher in the worst effects of global warming.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s take a collective breath and think about what withdrawal really means. After weighing many pros and cons, I believe it\u2019s sensible to conclude it doesn\u2019t really matter. <\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s because efforts by cities, states and companies are already underway to keep up the spirit of Paris, even if the feds won\u2019t. We\u2019re at a point where ecological forces such as climate change are increasingly driving economic behavior, as <a href=\"http:\/\/web.a.ebscohost.com\/abstract?direct=true&amp;profile=ehost&amp;scope=site&amp;authtype=crawler&amp;jrnl=19445083&amp;AN=47365043&amp;h=WkIUBVO0E30u8ptyMGpJJdmq8YoHAwBVSq27lTIKpPFivcMk6T%2bdnJTRuU%2bZp52QJBK1CFSG00yNO9fUG1rjEA%3d%3d&amp;crl=c&amp;resultNs=AdminWebAuth&amp;resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&amp;crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d19445083%26AN%3d47365043\">I explored in a 2009 paper<\/a>, which is making these efforts to combat it more inevitable, regardless of Trump. <\/p>\n<p>While the Paris withdrawal is unfortunate, there\u2019s a bigger threat. <\/p>\n<h2>Reasons to worry?<\/h2>\n<p>From a political perspective, the United States <a href=\"http:\/\/economictimes.indiatimes.com\/news\/international\/world-news\/in-climate-talks-its-always-been-america-first\/articleshow\/58955848.cms\">has often been<\/a> a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2001\/mar\/29\/globalwarming.usnews\">noncontributor<\/a> in the global carbon emissions reduction game. <\/p>\n<p>The United States signed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2013\/07\/26\/world\/kyoto-protocol-fast-facts\/index.html\">but never ratified the Kyoto Protocol<\/a> \u2013 citing many of the same reasons as President Trump (large, developing countries are held to lower standards, and this will put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage). <\/p>\n<p>Yet there was far less outrage with Kyoto \u2013 probably because people knew less about climate change. We know more now and <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/we-need-to-get-rid-of-carbon-in-the-atmosphere-not-just-reduce-emissions-72573\">realize that climate change is real<\/a> and poses serious threats \u2013 anyone who actually reads the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.atmos-chem-phys.net\/16\/3761\/2016\/acp-16-3761-2016.html\">evidence<\/a> comes to this conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/blog\/2012\/nov\/26\/kyoto-protocol-carbon-emissions\">actual performance<\/a> of the Kyoto Protocol, however, does give us reason to worry today. While some countries did limit their emissions, many did not. The largest polluters (e.g., China and the United States) did not participate, so the <a href=\"https:\/\/350.org\/science\/#causes\">carbon emissions problem continued to get worse<\/a>, which is a serious problem. <\/p>\n<h2>\u2018Creative destruction\u2019<\/h2>\n<p>Fortunately there are trends in force that will likely limit the practical effect of Trump\u2019s decision and, in fact, may make it almost meaningless over time, for three reasons. <\/p>\n<p>Before I get to those, a brief economics lesson. Economist Joseph Schumpeter in his 1942 book <a href=\"http:\/\/cnqzu.com\/library\/Economics\/marxian%20economics\/Schumpeter,%20Joeseph-Capitalism,%20Socialism%20and%20Democracy.pdf\">\u201cCapitalism, Socialism and Democracy\u201d<\/a> popularized the term \u201ccreative destruction.\u201d Schumpeter used this term to describe the process whereby old, inefficient capitalist systems, industries and ideas are destroyed by newer, more industrious and more highly valued capital. <\/p>\n<p>For example, been to a video rental store lately? Me neither. While video stores were useful in their time, technology changed the game (seemingly overnight) and they became obsolete. This same creative destruction is beginning to occur now for oil, gas and other nonrenewable energies. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/maurapennington\/2013\/06\/19\/embrace-the-life-building-power-of-creative-destruction\/#28574d0c6454\">Companies such as Tesla<\/a> point to the future, and Schumpeter would state this is not only a good thing, but inevitable.<\/p>\n<p>Global warming isn\u2019t going to disappear, and engineers, scientists and companies in the United States know this and will push development \u2013 regardless of any accords. That leads me to my three reasons. <\/p>\n<p>First, states, cities and corporations in the U.S. can set carbon targets on their own that meet (or ideally beat) global goals. For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/onenyc.cityofnewyork.us\/\">OneNYC\u2019s 80&#215;50 commitment<\/a> to reduce emission in New York City by 80 percent by 2050. If more cities, states and corporations commit to ambitious environmental goals, than President Trump not signing the accord looks less important \u2013 and may, ironically, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/06\/01\/climate\/american-cities-climate-standards.html\">kickstart more innovation<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>Second, those cities and states that accomplish ambitious environmental improvements will benefit from new technology and cleaner environments and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.greenbiz.com\/article\/how-sustainable-cities-can-drive-business-growth\">will probably attract highly educated citizens<\/a> who appreciate progressive development. And that in turn could pressure other communities to follow suit as they witness the benefits.<\/p>\n<p>Third, the rest of the world will act likewise, so the countries that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oecd.org\/greengrowth\/green-development\/50559116.pdf\">lead with green technology will have a significant competitive advantage<\/a> in the future (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.americanprogress.org\/issues\/green\/reports\/2009\/06\/18\/6192\/the-economic-benefits-of-investing-in-clean-energy\/\">both domestically and internationally<\/a>). <\/p>\n<h2>The bigger threat<\/h2>\n<p>So while I\u2019m not pleased Trump withdrew from Paris, I\u2019m comforted that the impact will be limited. <\/p>\n<p>Americans should be less concerned about Paris and far more so with <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/us\/topics\/epa-11106\">what is happening<\/a> at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The administration\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/in-planned-epa-cuts-us-to-lose-vital-connection-to-at-risk-communities-74489\">changes<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2017\/03\/16\/white-house-seeks-to-cut-epa-budget-31-as-trump-targets-regulation.html\">proposed cuts<\/a> will have a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.environmentalintegrity.org\/trump-watch-epa\/trumps-proposed-cuts-to-epa-budget\/\">much more meaningful impact<\/a> on the environment, from the air we breathe to the water we drink, which will also harm the economy. <\/p>\n<p>In fact, the EPA \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/technology\/archive\/2010\/12\/gallery-why-nixon-created-the-epa\/67351\/\">notably established<\/a> by President Richard Nixon in 1970 \u2013 has been underfunded for many years. Its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/planandbudget\/budget\">workforce has declined 15 percent since 1999<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>The recent water crisis in Flint, Michigan, <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/the-science-behind-the-flint-water-crisis-corrosion-of-pipes-erosion-of-trust-53776\">offers a vivid illustration<\/a> of what happens when funding for environmental protection is cut: It becomes harder to spot, study, analyze and solve problems like Flint\u2019s. And many other areas in the country <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2016\/03\/24\/americas-water-crisis-goes-beyond-flint-michigan.html\">face similar threats<\/a> from polluted drinking water. <\/p>\n<p>The threat of climate change is real, and our withdrawal is disappointing, but creative destruction will continue and local governments and individual companies will pick up the slack. The effects of a weakened EPA, however, can\u2019t be made up for elsewhere. <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.edu.au\/content\/78820\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/>The consequences are far more important and immediate than Paris.<\/p>\n<p><span><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/robert-h-scott-iii-380235\">Robert H. Scott III<\/a>, Associate Professor of Economics, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/monmouth-university-1242\">Monmouth University<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>This article was originally published on <a href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\">The Conversation<\/a>. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/why-trumps-withdrawal-from-paris-doesnt-matter-as-much-as-you-think-78820\">original article<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Robert H. Scott III, Monmouth University Many reacted to President Donald Trump\u2019s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord with understandable dismay, fearful that the U.S. is shirking its global leadership role, will fall behind in green technology and is helping usher in the worst effects of global warming. Let\u2019s take a collective breath [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":9306,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,277],"tags":[2479,139,1975,2173,156,2361,1602],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9305"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9305"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9307,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9305\/revisions\/9307"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lifeandnews.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}